Elmer v. Danzenbacker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Elmer v. Danzenbacker

37 N.J.L. 363

DecidedFebruary 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 37 N.J.L. 363 (Elmer v. Danzenbacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmer v. Danzenbacker, 37 N.J.L. 363 (N.J. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

The record and proceedings in this case are, in all respects, the same as in the preceding, with the single exception that, instead of the words, “ the plaintiff was sworn to the account,” the present record sets forth that, “ the plaintiff was put upon her oath, who swore to the items set forth in the case.”

For the reasons given in the case of Buck v. Danzenbacker, the record and proceedings in the present case are also fatally defective, and the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The record and proceedings in this case are, in all respects, the same as in the preceding, with the single exception that, instead of the words, “ the plaintiff was sworn to the account,” the present record sets forth that, “ the plaintiff was put upon her oath, who swore to the items set forth in the case.”

For the reasons given in the case of Buck v. Danzenbacker, the record and proceedings in the present case are also fatally defective, and the judgment is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 N.J.L. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmer-v-danzenbacker-nj-1875.