Elmer Stevens Whiting v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Elmer Stevens Whiting v. United States

223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4039

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1955

Docket12242

StatusPublished

This text of 223 F.2d 924 (Elmer Stevens Whiting v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmer Stevens Whiting v. United States, 223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4039 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause having come on to be heard on an appeal from the district court denying appellant’s motion to annul, vacate, and set aside sentence, including appellant’s amendment made thereto after the filing of the principal motion, and it appearing that a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was issued by the district court, pursuant to which, appellant appeared and testified in open court upon the hearing of his motion, and it further appearing that the district court considered, in a comprehensive opinion, the contentions, testimony, and evidence of appellant and the applicable statutes and adjudications upon a review of the entire record, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge MpNamee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause having come on to be heard on an appeal from the district court denying appellant’s motion to annul, vacate, and set aside sentence, including appellant’s amendment made thereto after the filing of the principal motion, and it appearing that a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was issued by the district court, pursuant to which, appellant appeared and testified in open court upon the hearing of his motion, and it further appearing that the district court considered, in a comprehensive opinion, the contentions, testimony, and evidence of appellant and the applicable statutes and adjudications upon a review of the entire record, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge MpNamee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmer-stevens-whiting-v-united-states-ca6-1955.