Elmer Eugene Chronister v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Elmer Eugene Chronister v. United States

196 F.2d 1019, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1952

Docket11477

StatusPublished

This text of 196 F.2d 1019 (Elmer Eugene Chronister v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmer Eugene Chronister v. United States, 196 F.2d 1019, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this criminal case came on to he heard on the oral arguments of attorneys for the appellant, Elmer Eugene Chronister, and for the appellee, United States of America, and has been duly considered on the briefs filed by both parties and on the whole record in the case;

From all of which it appears that there is no merit in the points made by appellant on appeal, it appearing that he was afforded by the District Judge ample opportunity upon his arraignment to have an attorney appointed to represent him and stated positively that he wanted to plead guilty and did not desire to have an attorney appointed by the court to represent him before he was sentenced;

Accordingly, the motion of appellant to vacate sentence is denied and the judgment entered in the District Court from which the appeal was taken is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this criminal case came on to he heard on the oral arguments of attorneys for the appellant, Elmer Eugene Chronister, and for the appellee, United States of America, and has been duly considered on the briefs filed by both parties and on the whole record in the case;

From all of which it appears that there is no merit in the points made by appellant on appeal, it appearing that he was afforded by the District Judge ample opportunity upon his arraignment to have an attorney appointed to represent him and stated positively that he wanted to plead guilty and did not desire to have an attorney appointed by the court to represent him before he was sentenced;

Accordingly, the motion of appellant to vacate sentence is denied and the judgment entered in the District Court from which the appeal was taken is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 F.2d 1019, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmer-eugene-chronister-v-united-states-ca6-1952.