Elmer Ervin Riddle v. Ira M. Coiner, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary
This text of 432 F.2d 925 (Elmer Ervin Riddle v. Ira M. Coiner, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It has been settled by the Supreme Court of West Virginia that a court record reciting that a recidivist has been “duly cautioned” is merely a “ * * * conclusion instead of a statement of fact * * *” and is itself insufficient, when questioned, to establish the necessary warning to a recidivist. State ex rel. Beckett v. Boles, 149 W.Va. 112, 138 S.E.2d 851, 856 (1964).
Where, as here, the petitioner denies he was warned, and there is no *926 contrary evidence other than expressions of opinion that it was the judge’s invariable practice, we think the petitioner has sustained his burden. Without the warning it is clear that an additional sentence for recidivism is void. State ex rel. Robb v. Boles, 148 W.Va. 641, 136 S.E.2d 891 (1964). On remand the district court will issue the writ.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 F.2d 925, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmer-ervin-riddle-v-ira-m-coiner-warden-of-the-west-virginia-state-ca4-1970.