Elmer Banks v. Wainwright

Supreme Court

Elmer Banks v. Wainwright

375 U.S. 51, 84 S. Ct. 152, 11 L. Ed. 2d 108, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 403

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1963·No. 76 M·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.

Elmer Banks v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 51, 84 S. Ct. 152, 11 L. Ed. 2d 108, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 403 (1963).

Pincite

375 U.S. 51 (Elmer Banks v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related