Elmendorf v. Harris

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29

Opinion

The Court of Errors, held, however, that this award, made without notice of the hearing before the umpire to the losing party was void ; that an umpire cannot be appointed by parol, where, as in this case, it was expressly agreed, that the submission should be made a rule of Court under the statute:—though it would be good if it had been a mere common law arbitration. Per Chancellor, W. delivering the opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed 18 to none.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elmendorf v. Harris, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29 (Elmendorf v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.