Elmendorf v. Harris

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Elmendorf v. Harris

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29 (Elmendorf v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmendorf v. Harris, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors, held, however, that this award, made without notice of the hearing before the umpire to the losing party was void ; that an umpire cannot be appointed by parol, where, as in this case, it was expressly agreed, that the submission should be made a rule of Court under the statute:—though it would be good if it had been a mere common law arbitration. Per Chancellor, W. delivering the opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed 18 to none.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors, held, however, that this award, made without notice of the hearing before the umpire to the losing party was void ; that an umpire cannot be appointed by parol, where, as in this case, it was expressly agreed, that the submission should be made a rule of Court under the statute:—though it would be good if it had been a mere common law arbitration. Per Chancellor, W. delivering the opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed 18 to none.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmendorf-v-harris-nycterr-1799.