Elman v. Cadesky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Elman v. Cadesky

553 So. 2d 391, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2910, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983, 1989 WL 149583

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 13, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2556

StatusPublished

This text of 553 So. 2d 391 (Elman v. Cadesky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elman v. Cadesky, 553 So. 2d 391, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2910, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983, 1989 WL 149583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of a third-party complaint. Based upon the record we determine that it has not been demonstrated that appellant could not amend his pleading to state a cause of action. We further find that appellant has not previously been given an opportunity to amend this particular pleading. Accordingly, it was error to dismiss the complaint without giving appellant at least one opportunity to amend. See Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of a third-party complaint. Based upon the record we determine that it has not been demonstrated that appellant could not amend his pleading to state a cause of action. We further find that appellant has not previously been given an opportunity to amend this particular pleading. Accordingly, it was error to dismiss the complaint without giving appellant at least one opportunity to amend. See Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 So. 2d 391, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2910, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983, 1989 WL 149583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elman-v-cadesky-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack