Ellman v. Baer

Fourth Circuit

Ellman v. Baer

474 F. App'x 388

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1271·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Emanuel Ellman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that his tax refund was property of his bankruptcy estate and ordering him to turn over to the trustee $4,615 of the funds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ell-man v. Baer, 467 B.R. 635 (D.Md.2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Emanuel Ellman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that his tax refund was property of his bankruptcy estate and ordering him to turn over to the trustee $4,615 of the funds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ell-man v. Baer, 467 B.R. 635 (D.Md.2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ellman v. Baer, 474 F. App'x 388 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 388 (Ellman v. Baer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related