Ellison v. West Virginia Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Ellison v. West Virginia Department of Highways

10 Ct. Cl. 177

West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided January 16, 1975·No. No. D-788·Published

Opinion

DUCKER, JUDGE:

Claimant, Clyde M. Ellison, of Princeton, West Virginia, and respondent have stipulated the claimant’s 1972 Pinto automobile was sprayed with paint by respondent’s workmen while the latter were painting a department shed located at the laboratory of Mercer County District Headquarters on or about May 7, 1974, and that the sum of $25.00 is a fair and reasonable cost of necessary repair. Accordingly, we award the claimant $25.00.

Award of $25.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUCKER, JUDGE:

Claimant, Clyde M. Ellison, of Princeton, West Virginia, and respondent have stipulated the claimant’s 1972 Pinto automobile was sprayed with paint by respondent’s workmen while the latter were painting a department shed located at the laboratory of Mercer County District Headquarters on or about May 7, 1974, and that the sum of $25.00 is a fair and reasonable cost of necessary repair. Accordingly, we award the claimant $25.00.

Award of $25.00.

Ellison v. West Virginia Department of Highways, 10 Ct. Cl. 177 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

10 Ct. Cl. 177 (Ellison v. West Virginia Department of Highways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.