Ellison v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ellison v. Town of Hempstead

305 A.D.2d 536, 759 N.Y.S.2d 353

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 536 (Ellison v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellison v. Town of Hempstead, 305 A.D.2d 536, 759 N.Y.S.2d 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), entered February 8, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court properly gave a charge on the element of initiation (see generally Rohman v New York City Tr. Auth., 295 AD2d 333 [2002]; Dudick v Gulyas, 277 AD2d 686 [2000]; Dempsey v Masto, 83 AD2d 725, 726 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 665 [1982]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), entered February 8, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court properly gave a charge on the element of initiation (see generally Rohman v New York City Tr. Auth., 295 AD2d 333 [2002]; Dudick v Gulyas, 277 AD2d 686 [2000]; Dempsey v Masto, 83 AD2d 725, 726 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 665 [1982]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 536, 759 N.Y.S.2d 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-town-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack