Ellison v. Town of Hempstead

305 A.D.2d 536, 759 N.Y.S.2d 353

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), entered February 8, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court properly gave a charge on the element of initiation (see generally Rohman v New York City Tr. Auth., 295 AD2d 333 [2002]; Dudick v Gulyas, 277 AD2d 686 [2000]; Dempsey v Masto, 83 AD2d 725, 726 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 665 [1982]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellison v. Town of Hempstead, 305 A.D.2d 536, 759 N.Y.S.2d 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 536 (Ellison v. Town of Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dempsey v. Masto
436 N.E.2d 1333 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Dempsey v. Masto
83 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Dudick v. Gulyas
277 A.D.2d 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Rohman v. New York City Transit Authority
295 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)