Ellison v. State

8 S.W. 462, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 328, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 1888
DocketNo. 5691
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 8 S.W. 462 (Ellison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellison v. State, 8 S.W. 462, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 328, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54 (Tex. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

It is essential in all prosecutions for theft, except for theft from the person, and theft of a horse, mule, ass or cattle, to both allege and prove the value of the property stolen. In this case the conviction is for the theft of corn, and there is no proof whatever in the record in support of the allegation of value. Wherefore the conviction is not warranted by the evidence, and must be set aside. (Willson’s Texas Crim. Stats., sec. 1285.)

There are other questions presented in the record which we do not determine, because they are not likely to arise on another trial.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rome v. Ahlert
332 S.W.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1960)
Missouri Pac. R.R., Thompson, Trustee v. Lawrence
223 S.W.2d 823 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1949)
Edmondson v. State
64 S.W.2d 795 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Adams v. Kelly
196 S.W. 576 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 S.W. 462, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 328, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-state-texapp-1888.