Ellison v. State Road Department

169 So. 2d 485
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 1964
DocketNo. 33620
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 169 So. 2d 485 (Ellison v. State Road Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellison v. State Road Department, 169 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for conflict cer-tiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of State Road Department etc. v. Abel Investment Company et al. reported at 165 So.2d 832. Factual background and questions involved are set forth in the reported decision, supra. It appearing that this court has no jurisdiction under Section 4, Article V of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A., the petition for certiorari is denied. However, by way of caveat we note that the opinion of the District Court refers to Section 29, Article XVI of the Florida Constitution as authority for condemnation proceedings by the State Road Department. At the time of the District Court’s decision in June 1964, that court did not have the benefit of the decision by this court in Daniels v. State Road Department, 170 So.2d 846, filed September 30, 1964, in which it was held that the State Road Department derives its power of condemnation under Section 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Florida Constitution of 1885, F.S.A., and that Section 29 of Article XVI was intended to apply only to private corporations and individuals and not the State, its agencies and political subdivisions. The erroneous reference, however, in the District Court’s opinion to Section 29 of Article XVI as the source of authority was more in the nature of obiter dicta and harmless in the circumstances here present.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and. ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., agrees to conclusion that the writ be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuttle v. Division of Administration, State of Florida Department of Transportation
327 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Jamesson v. Downtown Development Authority
322 So. 2d 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
DIVISION OF ADMIN., STATE DEPT. OF TR. v. Pink Pussy Cat, Inc.
314 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Glessner v. Duval County
203 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 2d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-state-road-department-fla-1964.