Ellison v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ellison v. State

83 S.E. 867, 15 Ga. App. 518, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 316

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 22, 1914

Docket6095

StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E. 867 (Ellison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellison v. State, 83 S.E. 867, 15 Ga. App. 518, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 316 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. Where no error of law is complained of, and there is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the repeated rulings Of this court and of the Supreme Court, the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be controlled.

2. There was no assignment of any error of law upon the trial under review, and the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of the jury; and the trial judge having approved their finding, his judgment, overruling the motion for a new trial, is Affirmed.

Indictment for burglary; from Putnam superior court—Judgp Park. October 3, 1914.

M. F. Adams, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Pottle, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. Where no error of law is complained of, and there is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the repeated rulings Of this court and of the Supreme Court, the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be controlled.

2. There was no assignment of any error of law upon the trial under review, and the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of the jury; and the trial judge having approved their finding, his judgment, overruling the motion for a new trial, is Affirmed.

Indictment for burglary; from Putnam superior court—Judgp Park. October 3, 1914.

M. F. Adams, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Pottle, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 S.E. 867, 15 Ga. App. 518, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-state-gactapp-1914.