Ellison v. State
This text of 572 So. 2d 1002 (Ellison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a belated appeal by way of habeas corpus, alleging that his counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him of his right to appeal his sentence. This case is governed by State v. District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990), which held that such claims should be filed in the trial court by motion pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Although this petition was filed prior to rendition of the Florida Supreme Court case, it was in the pipeline, so the petition is denied without prejudice to file a Rule 3.850 motion in the trial court.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 So. 2d 1002, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 1990 WL 211383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.