Ellison v. State
This text of 437 A.2d 1127 (Ellison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves an appeal from conviction of Resisting Arrest, 11 Del.C. § 1257, * in the Court of Common Pleas. Upon initial appeal, the Superior Court affirmed the conviction. Ellison v. State, Del.Super., 410 A.2d 519 (1979).
The defendant’s appeal therefrom to this Court is based upon substantially the same contentions raised below; i.e., that it was reversible error: (1) to refuse to suppress evidence of the defendant’s arrest and flight which were a direct consequence of an unconstitutional stop of his automobile; (2) to punish the defendant for his non-violent flight from an unconstitutional arrest; and (3) to rule that the defendant did not have the right to flee an illegal arrest.
The authorities cited here were cited below and carefully considered in the Superior Court opinion. We find no reversible error. Upon the basic principles set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court, the judgment below is
AFFIRMED.
11 Del.C. § 1257 provides:
“§ 1257. Resisting arrest; class A misdemean- or.
“A person is guilty of resisting arrest when he intentionally prevents or attempts to prevent a peace officer from effecting an arrest or detention of himself or another person or intentionally flees from a peace officer who is effecting an arrest.
“Resisting arrest is a class A misdemeanor.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 A.2d 1127, 1981 Del. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-state-del-1981.