Ellison v. Republic Manufacturing Corp.

251 A.D. 746, 296 N.Y.S. 38, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7352
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover the purchase price of goods sold, order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion the affirmative defenses pleaded in the answer are without merit, but there is an issue of fact as to whether the goods could readily be resold for a reasonable price. Without proof of that fact, the action is not maintainable under section 144, subdivision 3, of the Personal Property Law. There is also a variance between the plaintiff’s pleading and proof. The complaint alleges an actual delivery of the goods, and the affidavits show that there was no such delivery. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellison v. Republic Manufacturing Corp., 251 A.D. 746, 296 N.Y.S. 38, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

251 A.D. 746 (Ellison v. Republic Manufacturing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Trust Co. v. Talley
53 Misc. 2d 692 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Progressive Credit Union v. Mount Vernon Wiping Cloth Corp.
5 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Strauss v. Kende Galleries, Inc.
203 Misc. 941 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)