Ellison v. German and Coldwell

1 Tenn. 173
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedMay 6, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Tenn. 173 (Ellison v. German and Coldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellison v. German and Coldwell, 1 Tenn. 173 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1805).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jury will consider the debt, and interst, up to the time of the verdict in the county court. If they find the same sum, the judgment must be affirmed by the court here, with an allowance of twelve and an half per cent. In this case the jury will not calculate further than to the time of the judgment in the county court. If upon calculation they find that a less sum was allowed in the county court than the plaintiff was entitled to, they will calculate principal and interest, to that time, and find the sum which should have been found in the county court. The court will affirm this judgment, and allow twelve and an half per cent. But if the jury should think, there was judgment for too great a sum, they will calculate pincipal and interest, to this time. In this case the judgment will not be affirmed, nor twelve and a half per cent allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cowan, McClung & Co. v. East Tenn., Virginia & Georgia Railroad
65 Tenn. 69 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellison-v-german-and-coldwell-tennsuperct-1805.