Ellison v. Bank of Meeker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ellison v. Bank of Meeker

1911 OK 20, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 782, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 55

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 10, 1911·No. 666·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The note sued upon by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, was non-negotiable. All defenses that were permissible between the original parties are still available. The issues of fact were submitted under proper instructions, and the verdict of the jury, as *783 approved by tbe trial court in overruling the motion for new trial, there being substantial evidence to support the same, is conclusive on this court. Ft. Smith & Western R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 Pac. 10.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

All the Justices, concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

The note sued upon by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, was non-negotiable. All defenses that were permissible between the original parties are still available. The issues of fact were submitted under proper instructions, and the verdict of the jury, as *783 approved by tbe trial court in overruling the motion for new trial, there being substantial evidence to support the same, is conclusive on this court. Ft. Smith & Western R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 Pac. 10.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

All the Justices, concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.

Ellison v. Bank of Meeker, 1911 OK 20, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 782, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 55 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK 20 (Ellison v. Bank of Meeker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related