Ellis v. Tri-City Commercial Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ellis v. Tri-City Commercial Sales, Inc.

283 S.E.2d 670, 159 Ga. App. 441, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2636

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 8, 1981

Docket62296

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.E.2d 670 (Ellis v. Tri-City Commercial Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. Tri-City Commercial Sales, Inc., 283 S.E.2d 670, 159 Ga. App. 441, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The appellee, a real estate brokerage firm, sued the appellants to recover actual and punitive damages for their alleged conspiracy to deprive the firm of its right to receive a commission on the sale of certain land. The jury returned a verdict awarding the firm $10,000 in actual damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. In this appeal, the appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the appellee had any contractual relationship with the seller which would have authorized it to receive a commission. Held:

The evidence was amply sufficient to establish both that the appellee was the procuring cause of the sale and that it had a contractual right to receive a commission from the seller pursuant to an open listing agreement. The evidence was also sufficient to establish that the appellants engaged in a bad-faith attempt to deprive the appellee of said commission by arranging for the land to be deeded first to a dummy purchaser and then, immediately thereafter, to the actual purchaser, who was one of the appellants. Thus, an award of both actual and punitive damages was authorized. See generally Clayton McLendon, Inc. v. Judge & Co., 142 Ga. App. 659 (236 SE2d 683) (1977); Ideal Realty Co. v. Storch, 124 Ga. App. 271 (183 SE2d 520) (1971).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

The appellee, a real estate brokerage firm, sued the appellants to recover actual and punitive damages for their alleged conspiracy to deprive the firm of its right to receive a commission on the sale of certain land. The jury returned a verdict awarding the firm $10,000 in actual damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. In this appeal, the appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the appellee had any contractual relationship with the seller which would have authorized it to receive a commission. Held:

The evidence was amply sufficient to establish both that the appellee was the procuring cause of the sale and that it had a contractual right to receive a commission from the seller pursuant to an open listing agreement. The evidence was also sufficient to establish that the appellants engaged in a bad-faith attempt to deprive the appellee of said commission by arranging for the land to be deeded first to a dummy purchaser and then, immediately thereafter, to the actual purchaser, who was one of the appellants. Thus, an award of both actual and punitive damages was authorized. See generally Clayton McLendon, Inc. v. Judge & Co., 142 Ga. App. 659 (236 SE2d 683) (1977); Ideal Realty Co. v. Storch, 124 Ga. App. 271 (183 SE2d 520) (1971).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.E.2d 670, 159 Ga. App. 441, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-tri-city-commercial-sales-inc-gactapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack