Ellis v. Thilman
This text of 3 Va. 3 (Ellis v. Thilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the plaintiff ought to have alledged the want of probable cause, and that the omission was not cured by the verdict: consequently, that the judgment of the District Court was erroneous, and ought to be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
[* See Young v. Gregory, post, 446; Kirtley v. Deck et al. 2 Munf. 10; Marshall v. Bussard, Gilmer 9. And Muns v. Dupont, Cir. Ct. U. S. Penn. 4 Hall's L. Jour. 102, 2 Brow. Penn. R. App'x. 42, S. C.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Va. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-thilman-vactapp-1801.