Ellis v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ellis v. Stewart

51 S.E. 321, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 425

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 S.E. 321 (Ellis v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. Stewart, 51 S.E. 321, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 425 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. A 'forcible-entry proceeding, under the Civil Code, § 4823, is, after service of the notice therein required, a “ pending proceeding,” within the meaning of the Civil Code, §4950, which will authorize the judge of- the superior court of the county in which such proceeding is instituted to entertain an application to enjoin the same at the instance of the defendant, notwithstanding the plaintiff may be a resident of another county. Moore v. Medlock, 101 Ga. 94; Dawson v. Equitable Mtg. Co., 109 Ga. 389; Townsend v. Brinson, 117 Ga. 375.

2. The evidence being conflicting on material issues in the case, the discretion of the judge in refusing to grant an injunction will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

1. A 'forcible-entry proceeding, under the Civil Code, § 4823, is, after service of the notice therein required, a “ pending proceeding,” within the meaning of the Civil Code, §4950, which will authorize the judge of- the superior court of the county in which such proceeding is instituted to entertain an application to enjoin the same at the instance of the defendant, notwithstanding the plaintiff may be a resident of another county. Moore v. Medlock, 101 Ga. 94; Dawson v. Equitable Mtg. Co., 109 Ga. 389; Townsend v. Brinson, 117 Ga. 375.

2. The evidence being conflicting on material issues in the case, the discretion of the judge in refusing to grant an injunction will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 S.E. 321, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-stewart-ga-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack