Ellis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ellis v. State

478 S.W.2d 476

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1120 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 1972·No. No. 45216·Published

Opinion

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the sale of LSD, with punishment set by the jury at ten years’ confinement.

Appellant was represented by employed counsel- and is represented by employed counsel on this appeal.

Counsel has filed a brief stating that he has examined the record and finds no grounds of error which may be urged for reversal of this cause. Appellant’s counsel has furnished appellant with a copy of this brief, and appellant has had an opportunity to review the record and has filed no pro se brief herein.

A careful examination of the record before us has been made and we find that the appeal is frivolous.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the sale of LSD, with punishment set by the jury at ten years’ confinement.

Appellant was represented by employed counsel- and is represented by employed counsel on this appeal.

Counsel has filed a brief stating that he has examined the record and finds no grounds of error which may be urged for reversal of this cause. Appellant’s counsel has furnished appellant with a copy of this brief, and appellant has had an opportunity to review the record and has filed no pro se brief herein.

A careful examination of the record before us has been made and we find that the appeal is frivolous.

The judgment is affirmed.

Ellis v. State, 478 S.W.2d 476 (Tex. 1972).

Pincite

478 S.W.2d 476 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.