Ellis v. State

118 S.W. 543, 56 Tex. Crim. 22, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 155
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Tex. Crim. 14
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 14, 1909·No. No. 4081.·Published

Opinion

RAMSEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Johnson County on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors therein in violation of the local option law. On conviction he was fined $100 and imprisoned in the county jail for fifty days.

That appellant sold intoxicating liquors to the person named in the indictment is placed beyond dispute by the testimony, nor was there any evidence raising the issue, as claimed by appellant, of mere agency. Nor is there any merit in the contention that because Judge Adams, who was presiding at the trial of the case, had died subsequent thereto, and before the statement of facts was made up, that this necessarily entitled appellant to a new trial. In this case there was an agreed statement of facts filed. So that it is inconceivable that in this regard any injury or injustice was done appellant by reason of the death of Judge Adams. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, nor is there any claim that appellant was deprived of bills of exception by reason of the death of the judge presiding. There is no merit in any *23 of the contentions of appellant, and it is clear that the case should be affirmed, which is now done.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. State, 118 S.W. 543, 56 Tex. Crim. 22, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 155 (Tex. 1909).

118 S.W. 543 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.