Ellis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ellis v. State

33 S.E.2d 115, 72 Ga. App. 128, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 523

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 31, 1945

Docket30736.

StatusPublished

This text of 33 S.E.2d 115 (Ellis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. State, 33 S.E.2d 115, 72 Ga. App. 128, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the “number game.” The testimony set out in the petition for certiorari, together with the documentary evidence sent up in the answer of the trial judge, authorized the verdict, and none of the special assignments of error show cause for a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the “number game.” The testimony set out in the petition for certiorari, together with the documentary evidence sent up in the answer of the trial judge, authorized the verdict, and none of the special assignments of error show cause for a new trial. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 S.E.2d 115, 72 Ga. App. 128, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-state-gactapp-1945.