Ellis v. State

94 S.E. 629, 21 Ga. App. 499, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 660
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 19, 1917·No. 9222·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case it was proper for the court to give sections 70, 73, and 71 of the Penal Code in charge to the jury; but it was error to give them in immediate connection with each other, without appropriate instructions as to when the provisions of section 73 were applicable, so as to prevent confusion in their minds as to the provisions of section -73 and those of sections 70 and 71. Jordan v. State, 117 Ga. 405 (43 S. E. 747); Ball v. State, 133 Ga. 177 (65 S. E. 400); Franklin v. State, 146 Ga. 40 (90 S. E. 480); Waters v. State, 146 Ga. 102 (90 S. E. 712); Dunn v. State, 16 Ga. App. 9 (84 S. E. 488); Darly v. State, 16 Ga. App. 171 (84 S. E. 724).

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth and Bar well, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. State, 94 S.E. 629, 21 Ga. App. 499, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 660 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 629 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKibben v. State
77 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Smith v. State
181 S.E. 212 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)