Ellis v. State

647 So. 2d 263, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, 1994 WL 664103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 608 So. 2d 514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1994·No. No. 93-2382·Published

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm Appellant’s two judgments, the • imposition of statutory fees and costs, and the inearcerative and general probationary portions of her sentences in Case Nos. 92-2292 and 92-2299. However, we direct the trial court to strike the written special conditions of probation relating to the law library and to the Gulf Coast Criminal Justice Assessment and to conform the written orders in both cases to the conditions pronounced at sentencing. The trial court failed to pronounce either of those two assessment conditions at sentencing. Brown v. State, 600 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (requiring trial court to conform written order of probation to the conditions orally announced at sentencing).

BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. State, 647 So. 2d 263, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, 1994 WL 664103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 263 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
600 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Shaddix v. State
599 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)