Ellis v. State

241 So. 2d 130, 46 Ala. App. 289, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1970
Docket3 Div. 41
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 241 So. 2d 130 (Ellis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. State, 241 So. 2d 130, 46 Ala. App. 289, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421 (Ala. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

Jackie Ray Ellis stands convicted of murder in the first degree, with a sentence to life imprisonment.

This is a companion case to that of Youngblood v. State, 45 Ala.App. 580, 233 So.2d 520. Ellis, Youngblood and the victim, Frank Felder were prison inmates when the killing occurred.

An exception was reserved to the court’s oral charge as to conspiracy. The charge is substantially the same as the court’s oral charge in the Youngblood case, supra.

The circumstances of the killing are set out in Youngblood, supra. The tendencies of the State’s testimony are that appellant and Youngblood stabbed the deceased.

Defendant’s evidence tended to show he was not present when the killing occurred, but that Glen Dickinson, also killed, was the person who murdered deceased.

[290]*290The reasonable tendencies of the evidence justified the court’s instruction to the jury, which was a correct statement of the law of conspiracy. Youngblood v. State, supra and cases there cited.

James L. Brown testified that the day before he took the stand as a witness defendant said to him that “if I witnessed against him he’d kill me.” Allowing this testimony over objection was not error. It evidenced an attempt on the part of defendant to suppress testimony. State ex rel. ex parte Attorney General, 209 Ala. 5, 96 So. 605. It was not due to be rejected because it proves another offense. Sandlin v. State, 25 Ala.App. 311, 146 So. 82.

The judgment is due to be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ALMON, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
354 So. 2d 48 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Brown v. State
339 So. 2d 125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Lambert v. State
318 So. 2d 364 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Haisten v. State
280 So. 2d 209 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 So. 2d 130, 46 Ala. App. 289, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-state-alacrimapp-1970.