Ellis v. Southern Express Co.

122 S.E. 652, 32 Ga. App. 15, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 218
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. Southern Express Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Ga. App. 738
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1924·No. 14191, 14229·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. In the ease of Ellis v. Southern Express Co., 27 Ga. App. 738 (a) (110 S. E. 43), which was a suit between the same parties and based upon the same cause of action as the suit now under review, this court held that the trial court had no jurisdiction of the case. That decision, whether right or wrong, is the law of the case, and is res judicata as to that question. See Ellis v. Southern Express Co. (this case), 157 Ga. 629 (122 S. E. 48).

2. Under the above ruling the trial court erred in overruling the plea to the jurisdiction.

Judgment on cross-hill of exceptions reversed; main hill dismissed.

.Broyles C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. Southern Express Co., 122 S.E. 652, 32 Ga. App. 15, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 218 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

122 S.E. 652 (Ellis v. Southern Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Southern Express Co.
122 S.E. 48 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Ellis v. Southern Express Co.
110 S.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)