Ellis v. SAVANNAH BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF SAVANNAH

216 S.E.2d 109, 234 Ga. 355, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1132
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 6, 1975
Docket29862
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 216 S.E.2d 109 (Ellis v. SAVANNAH BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF SAVANNAH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. SAVANNAH BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF SAVANNAH, 216 S.E.2d 109, 234 Ga. 355, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1132 (Ga. 1975).

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

James Ellis filed a complaint in the Chatham County Superior Court against the Savannah Bank & Trust Company, seeking specific performance of an alleged contract to sell certain real property. The defendant-bank filed its answer and a motion for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the alleged contract was oral and therefore violative of the Statute of Frauds. On December 27, 1974, the trial court granted the bank’s motion and Ellis now appeals the decision to this court.

Appellant contends on appeal that since he did not admit in his pleadings that the contract was oral, an issue of fact was joined that requires an evidentiary hearing for determination and it was therefore error for the trial court *356 to grant a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Submitted April 21, 1975 Decided May 6, 1975. R. B. Donaldson, Jr., for appellant. John M. Hewson, III, Olaf North Otto, for appellee.

We agree with appellant’s position and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant’s complaint never admits nor pleads that the contract was oral, and therefore there must be some type of evidentiary hearing to determine the fact question presented. The appellee could have required the alleged contract to be produced, but chose not to follow that course of action and absent any showing that there is not a written contract the appellant’s pleadings taken in their most favorable light present a question of fact.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salim v. SOLAIMAN
691 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Auerback v. Maslia
235 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Ellis v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.
229 S.E.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 S.E.2d 109, 234 Ga. 355, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-savannah-bank-trust-company-of-savannah-ga-1975.