Ellis v. Rudeseal

191 S.E. 913, 184 Ga. 519, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 18, 1937·No. No. 11697·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the question propounded by the Court of Appeals, the court consisting of six Justices is equally divided in opinion, Chief Justice Russell and Associate Justices Atkinson and Jenkins being of the opinion that the question should be answered in the negative, and Presiding Justice Beck and Associate Justices Bell and Hutcheson being of the contrary opinion. Therefore the question is returned to the Court of Appeals without an answer.

M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. Maddox & Griffin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. Rudeseal, 191 S.E. 913, 184 Ga. 519, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 554 (Ga. 1937).

191 S.E. 913 (Ellis v. Rudeseal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meeks v. Adams Louisiana Co.
49 F. Supp. 489 (S.D. Georgia, 1943)
Aetna Insurance Company v. Martin
12 S.E.2d 633 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Ellis v. Rudeseal
192 S.E. 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)