Ellis v. Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co.

1919 OK 295, 184 P. 573, 76 Okla. 175, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 150
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 14, 1919
Docket5279
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1919 OK 295 (Ellis v. Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co., 1919 OK 295, 184 P. 573, 76 Okla. 175, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 150 (Okla. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding in error is brought to review the judgment of the district court of Muskogee county, Oklahoma, in the case where Kenneth H. Murchison was plaintiff and Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, was defendant, and -the Cudahy Refining Company was a garnishee. In said cause plaintiffs in error intervened, claiming the moneys in the hands of the Cudahy Refining Company, a garnishee, which was also claimed by the Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Company. Judgment was rendered in favor of the Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Company and the intervenors, plaintiffs in error, appealed.

Neither party to this appeal has served or filed briefs as required by the rules of this court, or offered excuse for failure to do so. Where a cause has been -regularly assigned for submission and submitted, and the plaintiff in error fails to file a brief or to offer any excuse for not so doing, it will be presumed that the appeal’ has been abandoned and the same will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tulsa County Excise Board v. St. Louis -S. F. R. Co.
1937 OK 315 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK 295, 184 P. 573, 76 Okla. 175, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-mid-continent-oil-gas-co-okla-1919.