Ellis v. Kim

Opinion

Plaintiff Pro se, AN □ Noe. cows

Case ¥23-ov-05309 (PMH) Lig Lis □ | Plaintiff's application for an order directing a physical examination of himself pursuant ~tomitmmvnamntO Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is denied. “Rule 35 does not... authorize a party to file a motion for his own physical examination.” Crichlow v. Fischer, No. 15-CV-06252, {2017 WL 920733, at *9 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2017) (quotation marks omitted); accord Boland Wilkins, No. 18-CV-01958, , at *3 (D. Conn. May 25, 2021). foe Heseat.de 4The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion sequence at tye.) ~ fat Doc. 75 and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. oo Bemy me aysey [Philip M. Halpern a oth N United States District Judge veteds Dated: White Plains, New York County of Th May 27, 2025

or MB y TT Te coer i 1% Pr At i rei A io

ECEIVE MAGNUS MAHAKWE AKUDIKE NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK . Registration No. 01AK0021646 MAY 13 2025 | Qualified in Bronx County . Commission Expires February 29, 2028 W.P