Ellis v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga
183 F. App'x 692
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause. This appeal is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Rg’l Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ellis v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, 183 F. App'x 692 (9th Cir. 2006).
183 F. App'x 692 (Ellis v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
322 F.3d 1064 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)