Ellis v. Jenkins

295 S.E.2d 736, 250 Ga. 29, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 975
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1982
Docket39020
StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.E.2d 736 (Ellis v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. Jenkins, 295 S.E.2d 736, 250 Ga. 29, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 975 (Ga. 1982).

Opinion

Clarke, Justice.

This is an appeal of an order in an equitable proceeding between parties who are tenants in common of certain real estate. The effect of the order is to enjoin defendant-appellant Ellis from instituting statutory partition proceedings. We reverse.

The plaintiffs-appellees contend their action is one for partition in equity. We cannot agree with this contention for the reason that the petition makes no mention of partition and contains no prayer for partition. It prays that Mrs. Ellis be enjoined from filing statutory partition proceedings and that the entire fee to the real estate be vested in the plaintiffs after payment of certain amounts of money to [30]*30Mrs. Ellis. The fact that Mrs. Ellis is the holder of an undivided interest in the real estate is expressly alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint.

Decided October 6, 1982. W. Barry Williams, for appellants. Roy V. Harris, for appellees.

The law provides that common owners of lands and tenements may utilize the courts to seek a partitioning either in equity or in law depending upon the circumstances. Ga. Code Ann. §§ 85-1501, 85-1504. Plaintiffs’ petition as it now stands even after amendment is not a petition for partition in equity. It is error to enjoin a defendant who is a tenant in common from filing proceedings for partition. If such a proceeding is filed either as a new action or as an amendment or counterclaim to the present action, the trial court would then be in a position to determine whether equitable partition or statutory partition is appropriate under the facts of this case.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 85-1501
Georgia § 85-1501

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.E.2d 736, 250 Ga. 29, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-jenkins-ga-1982.