Ellis v. Hull

California Supreme Court

Ellis v. Hull

23 Cal. 160

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 Cal. 160 (Ellis v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. Hull, 23 Cal. 160 (Cal. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Crocker, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Norton, J. concurring.

This is an action upon an undertaking on appeal, and the only ground of error assigned is that no appeal had been taken, and therefore that the undertaking was without consideration. The evidence sustains the findings of the Court that an appeal had been taken, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court with costs, on the ground of the failure of the appellants to file the ■ transcript. The objection, therefore, is not well taken.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crocker, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Norton, J. concurring.

This is an action upon an undertaking on appeal, and the only ground of error assigned is that no appeal had been taken, and therefore that the undertaking was without consideration. The evidence sustains the findings of the Court that an appeal had been taken, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court with costs, on the ground of the failure of the appellants to file the ■ transcript. The objection, therefore, is not well taken.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Cal. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-hull-cal-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack