Ellis v. . Hetfield

Superior Court of North Carolina

Ellis v. . Hetfield

1 N.C. 71

DecidedSeptember 5, 1795

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 71 (Ellis v. . Hetfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. . Hetfield, 1 N.C. 71 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).

Pincite

Opinion

This was objected to by Slade, for the defendant: but And proof having given of the subscribing witness' handwriting:

WILLIAMS, J., required that the signature of the defendant should also be proved.

HAYWOOD, J., tacente.

It was accordingly done, and the plaintiff had a verdict.

NOTE. — See the note to Hamilton v. Williams, 2 N.C. 139, and the cases there referred to, and also the case of Saunders v. Ferrill,23 N.C. 97.

Cited: Ballard v. Ballard, 75 N.C. 192.

(72)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was objected to by Slade, for the defendant: but And proof having given of the subscribing witness' handwriting:

WILLIAMS, J., required that the signature of the defendant should also be proved.

HAYWOOD, J., tacente.

It was accordingly done, and the plaintiff had a verdict.

NOTE. — See the note to Hamilton v. Williams, 2 N.C. 139, and the cases there referred to, and also the case of Saunders v. Ferrill,23 N.C. 97.

Cited: Ballard v. Ballard, 75 N.C. 192.

(72)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-hetfield-ncsuperct-1795.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack