Ellis v. HATCHEW

Michigan Supreme Court

Ellis v. HATCHEW

767 N.W.2d 451, 483 Mich. 1132

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 10, 2009

Docket138083

StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.W.2d 451 (Ellis v. HATCHEW) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. HATCHEW, 767 N.W.2d 451, 483 Mich. 1132 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to Appeal Denied July 10, 2009:

Court of Appeals No. 279930.

Kelly, C.J., and Cavanagh and Hathaway, JJ. We would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because we are not persuaded that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion for summary disposition. When the facts are viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff, there were disputed issues of material fact relating to the applicability of the open and obvious danger doctrine.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to Appeal Denied July 10, 2009:

Court of Appeals No. 279930.

Kelly, C.J., and Cavanagh and Hathaway, JJ. We would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because we are not persuaded that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion for summary disposition. When the facts are viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff, there were disputed issues of material fact relating to the applicability of the open and obvious danger doctrine.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 N.W.2d 451, 483 Mich. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-hatchew-mich-2009.