Ellis v. Employment Division

570 P.2d 427, 31 Or. App. 385, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ellis v. Employment Division. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Or. App. 719
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 24, 1974·No. No. 76-AB-1380, 76-AB-1380A and 77-5-876EB, CA 7963 and 8364·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from two orders of the Employment Appeals Board, both of which affirmed referees’ decisions which in turn affirmed administrators’ decisions denying claimant unemployment compensation. Each order covers a different period. As to the first period, claimant was declared ineligible because there was suitable work available which without good reason he chose not to accept. As to the second period, claimant was denied benefits because he refused to accept work paying less than an hourly rate which he was not warranted in demanding and thus was not available for suitable employment. There was ample evidence to support the findings of the Employment Appeals Board in both instances.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. Employment Division, 570 P.2d 427, 31 Or. App. 385, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 685 (Or. Ct. App. 1974).

570 P.2d 427 (Ellis v. Employment Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.