Ellis v. Ellis
133 Mass. 469, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 263
This text of 133 Mass. 469 (Ellis v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ellis v. Ellis, 133 Mass. 469, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 263 (Mass. 1882).
Opinion
The question put by the counsel of the appellants, and excluded, was ambiguous. It might, and probably would, be understood by the witness as calling for his opinion as to the mental-condition of the testator. It was competent for the court to require the appellants’ counsel to change the form of his question so as to avoid this ambiguity.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Birch v. Strout
20 N.E.2d 429 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Clark v. Clark
47 N.E. 510 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 Mass. 469, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-ellis-mass-1882.