Ellis v. Ellis
11 Mass. 92
Opinion
But the Court thought it not sufficient evidence for the purpose [92]*92for which it was offered. The fact of the second marriage must be proved on oath.
Dr. Lathrop afterwards dame into Court, and, being sworn, testified to the fact of such second marriage, and a decree of divorce was passed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ellis v. Ellis, 11 Mass. 92 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 92 (Ellis v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McGraw
85 S.E.2d 849 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1955)
State v. Massie
78 S.E. 382 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)
People v. Le Doux
102 P. 517 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Hanley v. State
5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 488 (Lucas Circuit Court, 1896)
Whalen v. State
12 Ohio C.C. 584 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1896)
Stanley v. Stanley
4 Dem. Sur. 416 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1886)
Bussom v. Forsyth
32 N.J. Eq. 277 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1880)
Wedgwood's case
8 Me. 75 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1831)
Cayford's case
7 Me. 57 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1830)