Ellis v. Drug Enforcement Administration

D.C. Circuit

Ellis v. Drug Enforcement Administration

108 F. App'x 637

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 1, 2004

DocketNo. 04-1176

StatusPublished

This text of 108 F. App'x 637 (Ellis v. Drug Enforcement Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis v. Drug Enforcement Administration, 108 F. App'x 637 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for review, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. Setting aside that petitioner’s argument concerning the invalidity of the criminal statutes under which he was convicted is completely meritless, the DEA is not authorized to provide the relief that petitioner seeks, and he must challenge his convictions through a motion to vacate his sentence filed in the sentencing court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI