Ellis v. Curtis

113 N.W. 1134, 102 Minn. 517, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 495
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 22, 1907
DocketNos. 15,455—(87)
StatusPublished

This text of 113 N.W. 1134 (Ellis v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. Curtis, 113 N.W. 1134, 102 Minn. 517, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 495 (Mich. 1907).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was damaged by being run into by an automobile, which injured his horse and buggy. He recovered a verdict for $300. The trial court granted a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. The issue was whether the respondent, the owner of the automobile, was present when the accident occurred; the respondent claiming that the machine was then being used by a person who was not at the time in his em[518]*518ploy and not engaged ini his business. As the evidence was not manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict, the order of the trial court will not be disturbed.

Order affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 N.W. 1134, 102 Minn. 517, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-curtis-minn-1907.