Ellis v. Coombe

253 A.D.2d 945, 679 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9489
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 17, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 945 (Ellis v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. Coombe, 253 A.D.2d 945, 679 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of failing to comply with facility correspondence procedures and soliciting in violation of various prison disciplinary rules after he sent a card to a female correction counselor in an attempt to develop a romantic relationship. The misbehavior report, the correction counselor’s testimony and the contents of the card connecting it to petitioner, together with petitioner’s handwriting samples which the Hearing Officer compared with the card, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Kalwasinski v Senkowski, 244 AD2d 738). To the extent that petitioner’s testimony conflicted with the other evidence at the hearing, this created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of De La Rosa v Portuondo, 247 AD2d 810, 811). Even if petitioner’s remaining contentions were preserved for our review, his claims that he was denied due process and that the misbehavior report was deficient as it was not endorsed lack merit (see, [946]*946Matter of Applegate v Coombe, 237 AD2d 836, lv denied 90 NY2d 803; Matter of Richardson v Coombe, 231 AD2d 789).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Davis v. Bedard
2018 NY Slip Op 8608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Christian v. Venettozzi
114 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Williams v. Goord
27 A.D.3d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Surdis v. Walsh
295 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Tumminia v. Senkowski
290 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Soto v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
275 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Roman v. Goord
272 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Odom v. Goord
271 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Di Rose v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
270 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Green v. Senkowski
269 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Garcia v. Selsky
266 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Rodriguez v. Goord
261 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cliff v. De Celle
260 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Charles v. Barkley
257 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 945, 679 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1998.