Ellis v. Continental Casualty Insurance

381 So. 2d 1095, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1979·No. No. NN-324·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. GEICO v. Taylor, 342 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Main Insurance Company v. Wiggins, 349 So.2d 683 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

We note our decision is also in accord with Travelers Insurance Company v. Pac, 337 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Richendollar, 368 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The Third DCA has held to the contrary. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Curry, 371 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

[1096] We believe that Travelers Insurance Company v. Pac, supra and GEICO v. Taylor, supra represent the better view and decline to recede from our prior ruling.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. Continental Casualty Insurance, 381 So. 2d 1095, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

381 So. 2d 1095 (Ellis v. Continental Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Taylor
342 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Village of North Palm Beach v. School Bd.
349 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Richendollar
368 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Pac
337 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Curry
371 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)