Ellis v. Continental Casualty Insurance
This text of 381 So. 2d 1095 (Ellis v. Continental Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. GEICO v. Taylor, 342 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Main Insurance Company v. Wiggins, 349 So.2d 683 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
We note our decision is also in accord with Travelers Insurance Company v. Pac, 337 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Richendollar, 368 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The Third DCA has held to the contrary. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Curry, 371 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
[1096]*1096We believe that Travelers Insurance Company v. Pac, supra and GEICO v. Taylor, supra represent the better view and decline to recede from our prior ruling.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 So. 2d 1095, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-continental-casualty-insurance-fladistctapp-1979.