Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 111 F.2d 896 (Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Comes the appellee by its attorneys and confesses error in the judgment of the District Court entered November 25, 1939, and consents that the same should be reversed, and it appearing that the order appealed from which granted appellee’s motion to vacate proceedings, order staying sale and for leave to proceed with foreclosure, was erroneous, in view of the decision by the Supreme Court in the case of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bartels, 308 U.S. 180, 60 S.Ct. 221, 84 L.Ed. -, it is therefore set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Appellee will pay all the costs of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 F.2d 896, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-connecticut-mutual-life-insurance-ca6-1940.