Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Sixth Circuit

Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

111 F.2d 896, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3802

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 15, 1940·No. No. 8535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Comes the appellee by its attorneys and confesses error in the judgment of the District Court entered November 25, 1939, and consents that the same should be reversed, and it appearing that the order appealed from which granted appellee’s motion to vacate proceedings, order staying sale and for leave to proceed with foreclosure, was erroneous, in view of the decision by the Supreme Court in the case of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bartels, 308 U.S. 180, 60 S.Ct. 221, 84 L.Ed. -, it is therefore set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Appellee will pay all the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Comes the appellee by its attorneys and confesses error in the judgment of the District Court entered November 25, 1939, and consents that the same should be reversed, and it appearing that the order appealed from which granted appellee’s motion to vacate proceedings, order staying sale and for leave to proceed with foreclosure, was erroneous, in view of the decision by the Supreme Court in the case of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bartels, 308 U.S. 180, 60 S.Ct. 221, 84 L.Ed. -, it is therefore set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Appellee will pay all the costs of this appeal.

Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance, 111 F.2d 896, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3802 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

111 F.2d 896 (Ellis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related