Ellis v. City of Greensboro

91 S.E. 218, 19 Ga. App. 147, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 35
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 23, 1917
Docket8004
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 218 (Ellis v. City of Greensboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. City of Greensboro, 91 S.E. 218, 19 Ga. App. 147, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 35 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

No error of law is complained of, and the judgment of the mayor, finding the defendant guilty, is supported by direct evidence, and has been approved by the judge of the superior court. This court will not interfere with the judgment, although the credibility of the witness sworn for the city is attacked by more than one witness. Combs v. Carrollton, 17 Ga. App. 328 (86 S. E. 738); Rice v. Eatonton, 15 Ga. App. 505 (83 S. E. 868).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., amd Lulce, J., eoneur. Certiorari; from Greene superior court—Judge Park. November 4, 1916. J. 0. Faust, for plaintiff in error. Noel P. Park, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. City of Eatonton
83 S.E. 868 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Combs v. Mayor of Carrollton
86 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 218, 19 Ga. App. 147, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-city-of-greensboro-gactapp-1917.