Ellis v. Brewster
This text of 6 Watts 277 (Ellis v. Brewster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The same point was argued in this Court.
We think it our duty to interpose on a ground not taken by counsel. The-defendant below, appealed from the judgment of a justice against him for four dollars; and it does not appear from any cross demand set up before the magistrate, or in the common pleas, that more was in dispute: so that the common pleas could not rightfully hold jurisdiction of the appeal. The [278]*278judgment is therefore reversed, the apeal quashed, and the record remitted to have the judgment of this court carried into execution.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Watts 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-brewster-pa-1837.