Ellis v. Brewster

6 Watts 277
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 1837
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Watts 277 (Ellis v. Brewster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. Brewster, 6 Watts 277 (Pa. 1837).

Opinion

The same point was argued in this Court.

Per Curiam.

We think it our duty to interpose on a ground not taken by counsel. The-defendant below, appealed from the judgment of a justice against him for four dollars; and it does not appear from any cross demand set up before the magistrate, or in the common pleas, that more was in dispute: so that the common pleas could not rightfully hold jurisdiction of the appeal. The [278]*278judgment is therefore reversed, the apeal quashed, and the record remitted to have the judgment of this court carried into execution.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

High v. Schaefer
15 Pa. D. & C.2d 134 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Watts 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-brewster-pa-1837.