Ellis-Mcginnis Construction Co. v. the Estate of Holly Yanta

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 9, 2002
Docket13-02-00204-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ellis-Mcginnis Construction Co. v. the Estate of Holly Yanta (Ellis-Mcginnis Construction Co. v. the Estate of Holly Yanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis-Mcginnis Construction Co. v. the Estate of Holly Yanta, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-204-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

ELLIS-McGINNIS CONSTRUCTION CO.,                                  Appellant,

                                                   v.

THE ESTATE OF HOLLY YANTA, DECEASED,                            Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

                   On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

                                 of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

            Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, ELLIS-McGINNIS CONSTRUCTION CO., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 3 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 01-CPC-249-C.  After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 9th day of May, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ellis-Mcginnis Construction Co. v. the Estate of Holly Yanta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-mcginnis-construction-co-v-the-estate-of-hol-texapp-2002.