Ellis & Lewis v. Payne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ellis & Lewis v. Payne

1935 OK 794, 49 P.2d 151, 173 Okla. 474, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 457

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 17, 1935

DocketNo. 26232.

StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK 794 (Ellis & Lewis v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis & Lewis v. Payne, 1935 OK 794, 49 P.2d 151, 173 Okla. 474, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 457 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding was filed herein May 7, 1935, and is to review an award made to the applicant in the State Industrial Commission. On June 29th a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by Fred Payne, and on July 5th response thereto, In which it is made to appear that the position of this respondent, Fred Payne, in the Supreme Court is well taken, and that such motion is confessed.

There follows a stipulation signed by the attorneys for all parties. The motion, the response, and the stipulation have been examined, and it appearing from the record that the matters In the proceedings have been settled to the satisfaction of all parties, the proceeding is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS. WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding was filed herein May 7, 1935, and is to review an award made to the applicant in the State Industrial Commission. On June 29th a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by Fred Payne, and on July 5th response thereto, In which it is made to appear that the position of this respondent, Fred Payne, in the Supreme Court is well taken, and that such motion is confessed.

There follows a stipulation signed by the attorneys for all parties. The motion, the response, and the stipulation have been examined, and it appearing from the record that the matters In the proceedings have been settled to the satisfaction of all parties, the proceeding is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS. WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 794, 49 P.2d 151, 173 Okla. 474, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-lewis-v-payne-okla-1935.