Ellis-Hemby v. Toatley
This text of Ellis-Hemby v. Toatley (Ellis-Hemby v. Toatley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) JERRY ELLIS-HEMBY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0052 (ESH) ) BRANDON TOATLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
ORDER
On March 19, 2012, defendants filed a motion pursuant to Federal Civil Rule of
Procedure 12(b)(1) and (2) to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. On March 20, 2012,
the Court issued an order advising the pro se plaintiff to respond to the motion to dismiss no later
than April 20, 2012, and informing her that if she did not timely respond, the motion could be
deemed conceded and result in the dismissal of the complaint. (Order, Mar. 20, 2012 [Dkt. No.
6].) Plaintiff has neither responded nor sought an extension of time in which to respond.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 5] is GRANTED as
conceded; and it is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED.
/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge DATE: April 24, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ellis-Hemby v. Toatley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-hemby-v-toatley-dcd-2012.